Skip to main content Skip to footer

State Guide · Michigan

Gambling Options in Michigan

Sweepstakes casinos, licensed operators, and prediction markets available in Michigan — legal status, platform analysis, and player guidance.

Michigan state flag State Guide · Michigan

Michigan Online Gambling Guide

Sweepstakes casinos not available following MGCB enforcement from late 2023. Licensed online casino and sportsbook fully legal since January 2021 under the Lawful Internet Gaming Act. Prediction markets contested by both the MGCB and the Attorney General, with four separate federal lawsuits active as of May 2026.

State Capital
Lansing
Primary Regulator
Michigan Gaming Control Board
Online Gaming Since
January 22, 2021
Michigan State Capitol, Lansing
Sweepstakes Casinos
Not Available

The MGCB classified dual-currency sweepstakes platforms as unlicensed gaming under MCL Chapter 432 and issued cease-and-desist orders from October 2023. All major platforms, including Stake.us and VGW (Chumba Casino), have exited Michigan.

Source: MGCB C&D orders Oct–Dec 2023; MCL Chapter 432 · Accessed May 2026
Licensed Operators
Casino + Sportsbook

Full online casino, sportsbook, and poker market under the Lawful Internet Gaming Act and Lawful Sports Betting Act, both effective January 22, 2021. Michigan generated $2.9 billion in combined internet gaming revenue in 2024.

Source: MCL Act 152 of 2019 (LIGA); MCL 432.403 (LSBA) · Accessed May 2026
Prediction Markets
Restricted

AG Nessel filed a civil suit against Kalshi in state court (March 3, 2026) alleging unlicensed sports betting under MCL 432.403. Polymarket, Coinbase, and Robinhood each filed separate federal lawsuits to block Michigan enforcement. All cases pending.

Source: Michigan v. KalshiEX (Ingham Cty, Mar. 2026); MCL 432.403 · Accessed May 2026

Michigan operates one of the most significant online gambling markets in the United States, with $2.9 billion in combined internet gaming and sports betting revenue in 2024. The state was among the first to legalise both online casino gaming and sports betting comprehensively, and the Michigan Gaming Control Board has built a reputation as one of the most active enforcement regulators in the country, consistently pursuing unlicensed operators through cease-and-desist orders and referrals to the Attorney General. That enforcement reach extended to sweepstakes casinos in late 2023 and to prediction markets in 2025 and 2026. Sweepstakes platforms are not available and have not been since 2023 and 2024, when Stake.us and VGW exited following MGCB cease-and-desist orders. The prediction market situation is more fluid: Michigan is now the centre of the most complex multi-party litigation in the prediction market space, with the AG suing Kalshi and three major prediction market operators filing competing federal lawsuits to establish CFTC preemption of Michigan gambling law.

State Law Breakdown

Michigan's gaming framework is built on four primary legal instruments: the Lawful Internet Gaming Act (LIGA), the Lawful Sports Betting Act (LSBA), the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act (MGCRA), and the Michigan Penal Code's gambling provisions. The MGCB draws its enforcement authority from the MGCRA and has applied it broadly to sweepstakes operators, while the AG's lawsuit against Kalshi is based on the LSBA's prohibition on unlicensed internet sports betting.

MCL Act 152 of 2019
Lawful Internet Gaming Act (LIGA)
Licensed Operators

Enacted December 20, 2019, effective with MGCB rule-making, and in operation from January 22, 2021. LIGA authorises internet casino gaming in Michigan, limited to operators who partner with one of Michigan's licensed commercial or tribal casinos. A maximum of 15 internet gaming operator licences are available, one per master licensee. The MGCB issues and supervises internet gaming licences and has exclusive regulatory authority over licensed internet gaming activity. Unlicensed operation is a felony punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment or a fine of up to $100,000, or both.

Source: MCL Act 152 of 2019 (LIGA) · legislature.mi.gov · Accessed May 2026
MCL 432.403
Lawful Sports Betting Act (LSBA)
Licensed + Prediction Markets

Michigan's sports wagering statute, effective January 2021 alongside LIGA. Requires all internet sports betting operations to be licensed through the MGCB and linked to a Michigan commercial or tribal casino licensee. MCL 432.403 is the direct statutory basis for the Michigan AG's civil lawsuit against Kalshi, filed March 3, 2026. The complaint alleges that Kalshi's sports event contracts, including spreads, totals, and player props, constitute internet sports betting wagers and must be licensed in Michigan. Unlicensed internet sports betting operations are subject to the same felony penalties as unlicensed internet gaming under LIGA.

Source: MCL 432.403 · legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=mcl-432-403 · Accessed May 2026
MCL 432.201–432.226
Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act
Licensed + Sweepstakes

The foundational statute governing Michigan's commercial casino industry, under which the MGCB derives its broad enforcement powers. Under LIGA and the LSBA, those same MGCB powers are extended to internet gaming and sports betting operators. The MGCB used this authority to classify sweepstakes casinos as unlicensed gaming operations and issue cease-and-desist orders from October 2023 onward. Only entities that hold a licence under this Act (commercial casinos) or are authorised tribal gaming operators may apply for an internet gaming or sports betting licence, meaning sweepstakes-only operators have no licence pathway in Michigan.

Source: MCL 432.201–432.226 · michigan.gov/mgcb · Accessed May 2026
MCL Chapter XLIV (1931)
Michigan Penal Code — Gambling Provisions
Sweepstakes

Michigan's general criminal gambling statute, which the MGCB cited alongside the MGCRA in its cease-and-desist orders against sweepstakes operators. The Penal Code broadly prohibits any form of unauthorised gambling involving consideration, prize, and chance. The MGCB's position is that sweepstakes casinos offering cash-redeemable virtual currencies satisfy all three elements, regardless of the "no purchase necessary" structure, because the underlying model constitutes gambling for consideration. This interpretation has not been tested in Michigan courts, as all major operators chose to exit rather than litigate.

Source: MCL Chapter XLIV (1931) · legislature.mi.gov · Accessed May 2026
Terms vs Reality — Sweepstakes Casinos
Platform claims: Sweepstakes casinos argued their no-purchase-necessary model placed them within the federal and state promotional sweepstakes framework, outside Michigan's gambling prohibition.
What the MGCB says: Any dual-currency platform where virtual credits can be exchanged for cash requires an MGCB internet gaming licence under MCL Chapter 432. No such licence is available to operators without a Michigan commercial or tribal casino partner. The MGCB classified all major sweepstakes operators as unlicensed gaming operations and issued cease-and-desist orders. Stake.us, VGW (Chumba Casino, LuckyLand Slots), and PredictionStrike all exited rather than challenge this interpretation in court.
Michigan Gaming Control Board

Michigan Gaming Control Board (MGCB), Lansing. The MGCB has issued more cease-and-desist orders against unlicensed operators than any other state regulator, and is the primary enforcement body for all online gaming in Michigan.

DN
Analysis by
D.N. Finance Journalist & iGaming Industry Analyst View profile →

Sweepstakes Casinos in Michigan

Not Available in Michigan
Sweepstakes casinos are not available to Michigan residents. The Michigan Gaming Control Board classified dual-currency sweepstakes platforms as unlicensed gaming operations under MCL Chapter 432, and issued cease-and-desist orders to major operators from October 2023. Stake.us received its order on November 2, 2023. VGW (Chumba Casino and LuckyLand Slots) received its order on December 5, 2023. Both exited the Michigan market without legal challenge. No major sweepstakes operator has applied for a Michigan internet gaming licence, and no licence pathway exists for sweepstakes-only entities without a Michigan commercial or tribal casino partner. The MGCB has shown no indication it will relax this enforcement posture. Michigan residents have access to fully licensed online casino and sportsbook options under LIGA and the LSBA. View all state guides →

Licensed Operators in Michigan

Michigan has one of the largest and most established licensed online gambling markets in the US. Operators must hold an internet gaming and/or sports betting licence issued by the MGCB, linked to a Michigan commercial or tribal casino licensee. Up to 15 internet gaming operator licences are available, and all 15 have been awarded. The MGCB maintains a public register of all authorised internet gaming operators at michigan.gov/mgcb. Only platforms profiled on Wager Layer that are confirmed active in Michigan are listed, sorted by T&C Risk Score descending.

Player Recourse in Michigan
Michigan players can file formal complaints with the MGCB if a licensed operator fails to resolve a dispute through its own customer care process. The MGCB has authority to investigate, compel corrective action, and ultimately revoke a licence. This level of regulatory accountability is a meaningful player protection unavailable in the sweepstakes or prediction market space.
# Operator Products Licensing Authority Risk Score Profile
1
BetMGM logo BetMGM
Casino · Sportsbook · Poker MGCB — Internet Gaming & Sports Betting Licence 7.0 /10 View profile →

Only platforms profiled on Wager Layer that are confirmed active in Michigan are listed. Other major operators including DraftKings, FanDuel, and BetRivers also hold MGCB licences but are not yet profiled on this site. T&C Risk Score based on Wager Layer analysis of BetMGM's current Terms of Service. Source: MGCB internet gaming operator licence register · michigan.gov/mgcb · Accessed May 2026.

Prediction Markets in Michigan

Prediction market platforms remain technically accessible to Michigan residents, but the legal environment is the most contested of any state in the country. The Michigan AG has filed a civil lawsuit directly against Kalshi. Polymarket, Coinbase, and Robinhood have each filed separate federal lawsuits to block Michigan's enforcement on federal preemption grounds. Michigan is in the Sixth Circuit, the same jurisdiction where Ohio's enforcement efforts have also been sustained at the district court level. No Michigan court has yet ruled on the federal preemption question specifically in the Michigan cases. Availability is subject to rapid change.

Active Enforcement — Multiple Concurrent Cases
Michigan is simultaneously: (1) pursuing a civil AG lawsuit against Kalshi in state court, now removed to federal court; (2) defending against a federal lawsuit from Polymarket seeking to block enforcement — TRO denied March 10, 2026; (3) defending against a federal lawsuit from Coinbase filed December 2025; and (4) defending against a federal lawsuit from Robinhood filed March 2026. All cases rest on the same question: whether the Commodity Exchange Act preempts Michigan gambling law. Michigan has not obtained injunctive relief against any platform as of May 2026, and platforms remain accessible. However, Michigan has stated it will seek a permanent injunction against Kalshi.
# Platform CFTC Regulated Market Types Risk Score Profile
1
KL
Kalshi
AG lawsuit active
✓ DCM Political, Economic, Financial, Sports*, Climate 6.0 /10 View profile →

*Sports event contracts are the subject of a civil AG lawsuit (Michigan v. KalshiEX, Ingham County Circuit Court, filed March 3, 2026, now in federal court). Michigan seeks a permanent injunction. DCM = CFTC Designated Contract Market. Status subject to change. Source: michigan.gov/mgcb; MCL 432.403 · Accessed May 2026.

Regulatory & Legal Actions

Michigan's gambling oversight is driven by enforcement action rather than recent legislation. The state has had its core legal framework in place since 2019 and 2021 (LIGA and LSBA). The developments affecting players today are regulatory actions and court proceedings. No active sweepstakes or casino expansion bills were identified in the Michigan legislature as of May 2026. Last checked: May 2026. Source: legislature.mi.gov.

MGCB Cease-and-Desist Orders — Sweepstakes Stake.us, VGW (Chumba Casino / LuckyLand Slots), PredictionStrike IN EFFECT
PredictionStrike: October 19, 2023  |  Stake.us: November 2, 2023  |  VGW (Chumba / LuckyLand): December 5, 2023  |  Authority: MGCB under MCL Chapter 432

The MGCB publicly announced these enforcement actions on January 18, 2024, having issued the underlying cease-and-desist orders between October and December 2023. The Board classified each operator as conducting unlicensed gaming and sports betting in violation of LIGA, the LSBA, the MGCRA, and the Michigan Penal Code. All three operators exited the Michigan market without legal challenge. None applied for an MGCB internet gaming licence.

The MGCB has since issued further cease-and-desist orders against six additional unlicensed sweepstakes casino operators in 2025, whose names were not publicly disclosed. Full enforcement has been in effect since mid-2025, and no major sweepstakes platform serves Michigan residents as of May 2026.

Source: MGCB press release, January 18, 2024 · michigan.gov/mgcb · Accessed May 2026
Michigan v. KalshiEX LLC AG civil lawsuit — unlicensed sports betting under MCL 432.403 PENDING IN FEDERAL COURT
Filed: March 3, 2026  |  Original venue: Ingham County Circuit Court  |  Current venue: Federal court (removed by Kalshi)  |  Plaintiff: AG Dana Nessel

Michigan AG Dana Nessel filed a 22-page civil complaint against KalshiEX LLC in Ingham County Circuit Court on March 3, 2026. The complaint alleges that Kalshi's sports event contracts, including spreads, totals, and player proposition bets (the complaint cited a market on whether the Detroit Pistons and Washington Wizards would combine for over 224.5 points), constitute internet sports betting wagers under MCL 432.403, which requires an MGCB licence to offer legally in Michigan. Michigan is seeking a declaratory judgment that Kalshi operates as a sports betting app and a permanent injunction to stop it operating in Michigan.

Kalshi removed the case to federal court. The federal court is reviewing whether to retain jurisdiction or return the case to state court. Michigan chose to sue in state court rather than send a cease-and-desist order first, making it only the second state in the country to do so (Massachusetts was the first).

Source: Michigan v. KalshiEX, Ingham County Circuit Court, filed March 3, 2026 · michigan.gov/mgcb · Accessed May 2026
Polymarket · Coinbase · Robinhood v. Michigan Three separate federal preemption lawsuits filed against Michigan regulators PENDING IN FEDERAL COURT
Coinbase: December 2025  |  Polymarket: March 4, 2026  |  Robinhood: March 2026  |  Defendants: Michigan AG and MGCB

The day after the Michigan AG sued Kalshi, Polymarket filed a federal lawsuit against the Michigan AG and the MGCB, seeking to block enforcement of Michigan gambling laws against its prediction market contracts on Commodity Exchange Act preemption grounds. Coinbase filed a separate federal lawsuit in December 2025 on the same preemption theory. Robinhood filed a further federal lawsuit in March 2026. The court denied Polymarket's motion for a temporary restraining order on March 10, 2026, and Polymarket's motion for a preliminary injunction was set to proceed.

Michigan has become the centre of the most complex multi-party prediction market litigation in the US. All four cases rest on the same federal preemption question. Michigan sits in the Sixth Circuit, which has thus far favoured states over prediction market operators in the Ohio case (KalshiEX v. Schuler), though no Michigan-specific circuit ruling has yet been issued.

Source: Polymarket v. Michigan (Mar. 4, 2026); Coinbase v. Michigan (Dec. 2025); Robinhood v. Michigan (Mar. 2026) · Accessed May 2026
MGCB Investigation — Unlicensed Sports Prediction Markets Formal investigation opened into prediction market operators offering sports event contracts in Michigan ONGOING
Announced: April 11, 2025  |  Authority: Michigan Gaming Control Board  |  Related: MGCB letter to CFTC, April 2025

The MGCB announced a formal investigation into platforms offering unlicensed sports prediction market contracts in Michigan, citing concerns about consumer protection and market fairness. The same month, MGCB Executive Director Henry Williams wrote to the CFTC expressing those concerns. The investigation preceded the AG's civil lawsuit against Kalshi by eleven months and established the regulatory record on which the lawsuit is partly based.

Source: MGCB press release, April 11, 2025 · michigan.gov/mgcb/news/2025/04/11/ · Accessed May 2026

Player Guidance — Michigan

Michigan offers excellent licensed operator options with genuine regulatory protection, but the unregulated space (sweepstakes, prediction markets) is the most aggressively policed of any state in the country. The guidance below sets out the practical position for Michigan residents as of May 2026.

1
Michigan's licensed market is mature and well-protected — use it

Michigan has had legal online casino, sportsbook, and poker since January 2021. The MGCB is one of the most active gaming regulators in the country and has genuine enforcement power, including the ability to investigate, sanction, and revoke licences. Players with unresolved disputes with a licensed operator can file a formal complaint at michigan.gov/mgcb. This accountability structure is unavailable for sweepstakes or prediction market platforms.

2
Sweepstakes casinos are gone from Michigan — and will not return under the current structure

Stake.us, Chumba Casino (VGW), LuckyLand Slots, and every other major sweepstakes platform has exited Michigan and is inaccessible to residents. No operator has applied for an MGCB licence, and no licence pathway exists for sweepstakes-only entities. Do not attempt to circumvent geo-restrictions using a VPN. Doing so violates the platform's terms of service and may also constitute fraud under Michigan law. The MGCB's stance has not softened and there is no active legislative push to change it.

3
Prediction markets are accessible but under direct AG enforcement action — the situation can change quickly

Kalshi remains accessible to Michigan residents but is the subject of a civil lawsuit filed by the Michigan AG seeking a permanent injunction. Unlike Ohio, where enforcement came through a regulatory fine, Michigan went directly to court. Polymarket's attempt to obtain a TRO to block enforcement was denied in March 2026. No platform has been ordered to shut down yet, but the AG's enforcement goal is a permanent ban on sports event contracts in Michigan. Balances on Kalshi's sports event contracts in Michigan carry execution risk that balances on licensed sportsbook accounts do not.

4
Michigan is in the Sixth Circuit — not the Third

Players who read that Kalshi "won" in a federal court in April 2026 should note that ruling was in the Third Circuit (covering NJ, PA, DE). Michigan is in the Sixth Circuit, which denied Kalshi's emergency stay in the Ohio case and has not issued a ruling favourable to prediction markets. The circuit split is live and unresolved. Follow the Kalshi circuit split analysis for updates relevant to Michigan.

5
Michigan offers online casino gaming — you do not need sweepstakes alternatives

Unlike states where sweepstakes casinos fill a void left by the absence of licensed casino gaming, Michigan residents have full access to licensed real-money online casino games, sports betting, and poker. The sweepstakes market's absence in Michigan is therefore less impactful than in the majority of US states. MGCB-licensed casinos offer the same game types as sweepstakes platforms, under full regulatory oversight, with player funds held in segregated accounts and dispute recourse through the MGCB.

Warning — Prediction Market Enforcement
Michigan has filed a civil lawsuit against Kalshi and is actively seeking a permanent injunction. Three other platforms (Polymarket, Coinbase, Robinhood) have filed competing federal lawsuits. This is the most active multi-party prediction market litigation in any US state. Players using prediction markets for sports event contracts in Michigan should understand that the Michigan AG regards these as unlicensed sports betting, and a court could order cessation of access with little notice. Maintain minimal balances on sports event contracts in Michigan until the cases are resolved.

Wager Layer Analysis — Recommended Platforms in Michigan

The following platform scores 7.0 or above on the Wager Layer T&C Risk Score and is confirmed available in Michigan. Inclusion is based solely on T&C analysis. This is not a paid placement. See our methodology.

BetMGM logo
BetMGM Licensed Operator 7.0 /10

BetMGM holds MGCB licences for both internet gaming and sports betting in Michigan, offering online casino, sportsbook, and poker. Players in Michigan have full MGCB complaint escalation rights — meaningful protection unavailable on any unregulated alternative.

View Full Profile →

Change Log

Date Version Update
May 2026 1.0 Page published. Legal status research completed. Sweepstakes: Not Available (MGCB C&D orders, Oct–Dec 2023; MCL Chapter 432). Licensed Operators: Casino + Sportsbook (MCL Act 152 of 2019; MCL 432.403). Prediction Markets: Restricted (Michigan v. KalshiEX, Mar. 2026; Polymarket, Coinbase, Robinhood v. Michigan, Dec. 2025 – Mar. 2026). Platforms: BetMGM (7.0), Kalshi (6.0).
Disclaimer: Legal status information on this page is based on Wager Layer's analysis of publicly available statutes, regulatory orders, and court filings as of May 2026. It does not constitute legal advice. The Michigan prediction market litigation is active and rapidly evolving. Always verify current status directly with the Michigan Gaming Control Board or a qualified attorney before acting on any information published here.

Last reviewed: May 2026  ·  All state guides  ·  Methodology

This site uses cookies

We use Google Analytics to understand how visitors use this site. No personally identifiable information is collected. By continuing to use this site you accept our Privacy Policy